Texas Nationalist Movement

International & US Relations

Would the United Nations admit Texas as a member?

Almost certainly yes, in time, and the path is well worn. UN membership is not how a country becomes a country, and it is not the first thing a new nation needs. But Texas would qualify on the merits the day it declares, and the institution exists to admit exactly the kind of stable, functioning, peaceful state Texas already is.

Membership is not what makes you a country

First, clear up a common confusion. A seat at the United Nations does not create a nation, and the lack of one does not unmake it. Switzerland governed itself for centuries and did not join the UN until 2002. A country exists when it has a people, a territory, a government, and the capacity to deal with other states, and it conducts diplomacy, signs treaties, and trades whether or not it holds a particular membership card. Texas would be a country on the strength of those facts. UN membership is the formal welcome that follows, not the thing that confers existence.

How admission actually works

The procedure is set out in Article 4 of the UN Charter. Membership is open to "peace-loving states" that accept the Charter's obligations and are able and willing to carry them out. Admission is then effected by a vote of the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council. The General Assembly decides by a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting. So there are two gates: a recommendation from the Security Council, and a two-thirds vote of the wider Assembly.

Texas clears the substantive bar easily

Read the standard again: a peace-loving state, able and willing to keep international commitments. That describes Texas precisely. More than 30 million people, a defined territory, a functioning constitutional government, and an economy already woven into global trade. A Texas that arrives at independence through a peaceful, lawful, democratic vote is the textbook "peace-loving state." On the question the Charter actually asks, there is no serious case against Texas.

The honest part: the Security Council is political

Here is what we will not pretend about. The Security Council step is political, and any of its five permanent members can block a recommendation with a veto. The United States is one of those five. That is exactly why the relationship with Washington matters so much, and why securing a negotiated, recognized separation is part of the plan rather than an afterthought. A United States that has recognized Texas has no reason to veto Texas, and every reason to sponsor it, because a stable, friendly neighbor at the table serves American interests too.

Recognition can run ahead of membership

A new nation does not sit on its hands waiting for a UN vote. It builds bilateral relationships first. Recognition by individual countries, the exchange of ambassadors, and the opening of embassies all happen government to government, outside the UN process entirely. Plenty of recognized, functioning states have operated for years before or without full UN membership. Texas would establish itself as a country through those direct relationships, and UN admission would formalize a status the world already accepted in practice.

The trend is admission, not exclusion

The United Nations had 51 members at its founding. It now has 193. The whole arc of the modern era is new nations being welcomed in, not kept out, and the most recent additions came quickly after independence. South Sudan was admitted five days after it became independent in 2011. Montenegro joined within weeks of its 2006 independence. The institution is built to grow, and a country the size and stature of Texas is not the kind it turns away.

The bottom line

Texas would meet the UN's own membership standard the day it declares, and the long-run path to a seat is the ordinary one that dozens of nations have walked. The Security Council step is political, which is one more reason a recognized, negotiated separation with Washington is central to the plan. Membership formalizes nationhood. It does not grant it, and Texas does not need anyone's permission to be a nation.

Texas First. Texas Forever.

Texas should govern Texas. Be counted.

Become a TexianSign the
petition